Skip to content

Update visible-selector.xml #522

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AurelioDeRosa
Copy link
Member

Fixes issue #409.

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
<p>Elements with <code>visibility: hidden</code> or <code>opacity: 0</code> are considered visible, since they still consume space in the layout.</p>
<p>Elements that are not in a document are considered to be hidden; jQuery does not have a way to know if they will be visible when appended to a document since it depends on the applicable styles.</p>
<p>During animations that hide an element, the element is considered to be visible until the end of the animation. During animations to show an element, the element is considered to be visible at the start at the animation.</p>
<p>Attempting to detect if an <code>option</code> element is visible or not is completely useless. It'll be always hidden, regardless if it's selected (thus visible) or not.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AurelioDeRosa . This is good information to have in here. Thanks! I'm just not sure about the phrasing (e.g. "is completely useless" and "It'll be always"). Mind if I merge it in with some editing? Authorship will still go to you, of course.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kswedberg. Hi! Feel free to change anything you want to further improve the documentation. I also don't mind about the authorship as long as we, together, can improve the project. :)

@AurelioDeRosa
Copy link
Member Author

@kswedberg Is this PR good to merge?

@kswedberg
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the ping, @AurelioDeRosa . I'll check it out tonight.

@kswedberg kswedberg closed this in 10f0f86 Aug 5, 2014
@AurelioDeRosa AurelioDeRosa deleted the patch-1 branch August 5, 2014 12:30
@AurelioDeRosa
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for merging @kswedberg. I think there are other PRs ready to be merged, but I don't want to bother you pinging on each of them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants